Friday, October 31, 2008

OPINION: First column in Crescent Times ...


The crescent is a religious symbol. Originally it was a religious symbol of the Byzantine church/empire. After the conquest of Constantineople in the 15th Century by the Ottomans, it was adopted by the Ottoman empire. Eventually it became a Muslim symbol, and was adopted by a large number of nominally Muslim countries such as Tunisia, Malaysia and Pakistan.

And now it is the name of a newspaper published in Perth. The Crescent Times is sort-of a Muslim paper. But then, its target audience is the Muslim sort-of community.

I'm not sure if Muslims in Australia form a single community. Perhaps in smaller cities (such as Perth and Adelaide) they form a community. But what a about Sydney and Melbourne, where you can find Turkish and Lebanese and Pakistani and Bangladeshi mosques everywhere but nowhere an Australian mosque?

Anyway, here's my first "Planet Irf" column for the Crescent Times ...
________________

Over the past few weeks, 28 million copies of a DVD have been distributed to homes in swing states across the United States. By swing states, I mean states where neither the Republicans nor Democrats hold a strong sway and which could determine the outcome of the November US presidential election. They are the equivalent of what we call “marginal seats”.

You’d expect the DVD would concern topics directly related to the candidates, their parties and/or their policies. In fact, the DVD’s title is: “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against The West”. Among the “experts” featuring on the video is a blogger who has repeatedly claimed that Democratic Party candidate Barack Obama isn’t being up front about his Muslim past, even suggesting that Obama “practised Islam” by wearing a sarong! In Jakarta!!

As a direct result of the financial crisis, millions of American citizens are having trouble paying their mortgages and even more trouble selling their homes at a price high enough to just cover the principal amount of their loans. Millions more cannot even afford basic healthcare. Yet the hate-mongers aren’t worried about the real issues facing ordinary American voters. Their concern is to spread as much hatred as possible.

This hatred doesn’t just affect people who call themselves Muslims. Some days back, I received an e-mail from an Indian Christian living in New Zealand. I was struck by these words: “When I moved to western nations, I faced the prejudice of looking ‘middle eastern’ by many in the general public”. Hatred is so blind that it cannot tell the difference between an Indian Christian man and a Muslim woman wearing a hijab.

When spread far enough, hatred and ignorance affect every sector of society. The first FBI photo of suspects released after the September 11 terrorist attacks included two turbaned passengers, both Sikhs. The first hate-crime in reprisal of the attacks was also against a Sikh. Balbir Singh Sodhi, was gunned down while planting flowers at his family-owned petrol station in Arizona. His killer later admitted he shot the young man thinking he was a Muslim.

How do we overcome such hatred? Some people probably cannot be helped. Others are inspired more by ignorance. The opposite of ignorance is also its ultimate remedy – knowledge. We need to arm ourselves and our communities with knowledge.

I’m not suggesting we all go and enrol in an Islamic studies course. It isn’t so much ignorance of Islamic sciences that’s the problem. It’s more the great ignorance of Muslim reality. If people understood what we ordinary Muslims think, as opposed to what self-appointed Muslim leaders appearing in popular media claim we think, perhaps the hatred would decrease.

We cannot rely on leadership organisations to reflect our views. They don’t seem to care what we think, which explains why they spend more money taking each other to court than surveying ordinary Muslims about their views.

The ultimate solution is for ordinary Muslims to get involved in both other Muslim communities (including those outside our cultural and sectarian comfort zone) and the mainstream community. We need to be seen contributing to mainstream discussions and debates on mainstream issues, and be seen to be active in mainstream organisations. Many of us are already doing this, but many more need to get involved.

Once we do this, we’ll soon realise just how much we have in common. Our non-Muslim neighbours will understand that Muslim women don’t all wear hijab, and our fellow Muslims will learn that Muslim women (hijab or no hijab) are equally concerned about issues affecting all women – domestic violence, a decent education for their kids and a healthy environment for our future generations.

The fact is that there is no such thing as a peculiarly Muslim issue. The issues that affect Australian Muslims affect all Australians and vice versa. Whatever we might think of John Howard, we must surely agree with his mantra: “The things that unite us are more plentiful and more important than the things that divide us.”

Words © 2008 Irfan Yusuf

Delicious
Bookmark this on Delicious

Digg!

Get Flocked

Stumble Upon Toolbar

6 comments:

Morgaan Sinclair said...

BTW ...

I have had a copy of the Tarjuman al Ashwaq beside my bed for evening reading for three years, and Rumi is my favorite poet of all time. I think that Sufism is the answer, and I would suggest that the Sufis in the United States are one of the best possible models for this. Shaykh Haqqani has been brilliant about modeling perfect pluralism, peace, kindness and justice while being incredibly outspoken against terrorism and Wahhabi violent extremist ideology.

His genius is that he does both at once, and he never makes an excuse, never whines, never blames. He takes it upon himself to do everything in his power to stop the bad guys, and he never complains that non-Muslims being attacked complain about what is going on.

I don't know what we would do without him.

Anonymous said...

If morgaan thinks that wacko sheiks represent the Muslim mainstream, he should stay where he belongs with sickos like Qubrussi and Kabbani and al-Alawi and Schwartz.

There is no difference between Wahhabis and pseudo-Naqshis and al-Ahbash, even though they hate each other. Their approach to dealing with differences is exactly the same. That explains why they will always be on the fringe of the Muslim world.

Phil said...

we have 8 madhabs, now? wow never knew that....

Anonymous said...

Morgan has been watching too much TV. These problems are NOT a driving force of the problems in the Muslim world. To say that Hamas an Hizbollah are the cause of problems in the Middle East, while completely disregarding the Israeli(/US) role in the siege of Gaza and the invasion of Lebanon shows that Morgan is informed mainly by the Murdoch press.

I am intrigued as to why you do not mention the American backign of the Saudi regime, but attack this 'Salafism' as 'destroying Islam'. hmmmmm. I am not laying blame solely at the feet of the western countries for these problems. But surely you must recognise that your analysis is simplistic in the extreme.

Your comments do nothing to help solve any of the problems taking place in the Middle East, and reveal a narrow-minded ignorance on your part.

Anonymous said...

Another thing, I don't want to give the impression I sympathise with Salafism in any way. In fact I despise Salafism as much as the next man. However, my point is that it is not the problem that it is made out to be in the corporate media (as reported on Indonesia etc.).

Anonymous said...

"we have 8 madhabs, now? wow never knew that...." - Phil

The Mufti of Al-Azhar in Cairo issued a fatwa declaring that it is illegal to call someone a 'kafir' if they belong to one of the following 8 schools of Islamic law:

The 4 Sunni schools
the Ja`fari school(Shia)
the Ibadi school
the Zaidi school
the Zahiri school
= 8 madhhabs